Carbon-free fusion energy shows new possibilities, but still has a long way to go news

A Two recent experiments are fueling hope that nuclear fusion could become a dominant and reliable source of clean electricity over the next decade as countries work swiftly to reduce fossil fuel emissions.

Fusion, the process of combining atoms to produce energy, is one of several methods researchers are researching to reliably generate electricity without adding greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Much like its brother, nuclear fission, the atomic fission process used in the operation of nuclear power plants across the country, fusion manipulates elements that are abundant on earth and proponents say it could provide virtually unlimited power if the Developing technologies proves effective.

From today’s perspective, this is a big if, according to experts.

Scientists who oversaw fusion startup Commonwealth Fusion Systems and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s SPARC project earlier this month used its large, high-temperature superconducting electromagnet, designed to suspend extremely hot fusion-generated particles, to create a 20-tesla Generate magnetic field. According to the project, the magnet’s magnetic field was the largest of its kind ever generated.

Maria Zuber, vice president of research at MIT and EA Griswold professor of geophysics, said after the test that she was “genuinely optimistic” that the project can generate net positive energy based on the demonstration.

“Fusion is the ultimate clean energy source in many ways,” said Zuber. “The available power is really groundbreaking.”

CHINAS XI. JINPING vows to stop building new coal-fired power plants abroad

Across the country at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, scientists recently tested a laser in the lab’s National Ignition Facility that produces a record of more than 10 quadrillion watts of fusion power for a fraction of a second.

Although the focus of this project is on the ignition of nuclear weapons rather than generating electricity, the development adds to a group of research proponents who argue that fusion holds great promise, but experts are slow to declare emerging fusion technologies an integral part of the future network .

In particular, the news of the SPARC demonstration was “a step in the right direction,” but a number of questions about the merger remain unanswered, said Adam Stein, senior nuclear analyst at the Breakthrough Institute, an environmental think tank.

“It’s like saying I’ve developed a rocket engine that can put us into orbit. But there are many steps between making this rocket engine that can get us into orbit and doing the actual work, ”Stein said. “You have to build the rest of the rocket and you have to train the team and you have to get a license and all sorts of other things.”

One of the unanswered questions is whether developers can prove that the technology is profitable and generates energy on the scale required to power a functioning power plant.

“The problem with fusion is that it has to happen at very high temperatures and very high pressures, and while some companies have successfully performed fusion processes, they are currently using more energy to put this in the fusion reactor than you are getting back.” in the heat, “Stein said, recalling Zuber’s emphasis on net positive generation. So it costs you to run a fusion reactor instead of generating and selling free energy.”

The schedules offered by the developers further add to the caution with the merger and show why there is still a lack of public investment in fusion technologies, Stein said.

A document from a recent meeting of the Nuclear Supervision Commission estimates that the design and testing of a number of existing fusion projects will continue over the decade, with the first reactors expected to come online in the 2030s. In the meantime, the deadline for licensing actual fusion demonstrations by the NRC is 2027.

“If the regulator does not expect to license even a demonstration by 2027, then it signals why Congress did not see it as a priority to get the Atonement Bill in place,” Stein said.

The clean properties of the energy generated by fusion make them inherently more palatable than carbon-based sources to those who control the levers. Replacing fossil fuels with carbon-free energy sources is perhaps the top priority of the Biden government and Democrats in Congress, and there is consensus that meeting government deadlines for decarbonizing energy and climate will require the use of a variety of renewable and other carbons will require -Free energy technologies that work together.

Renewable sources such as wind and solar energy alone will not be able to support the national power grid, as Zuber from MIT has confirmed in a video-pitching merger as a reliable source for switchable electricity or electricity that can be scaled according to needs, renewable energies.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

David Hart, Senior Fellow at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation and Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University, agreed with Zuber’s assessment, saying, “The main thing is that you must have some sort of disconnectable power, be it natural gas with CO2 capture or nuclear. “

“This is the hole that we would have to fill with no emissions,” said Hart, but he noted that it is still unclear whether the merger is up to the task.

“The inventors will always be super excited about their widget, and they should be,” he said. “They want them to work all night trying to make it work, but that doesn’t mean every one of them will be successful. Take it with a grain of salt. “

Original location: Carbon-free fusion energy shows new possibilities, but has a long way to go

Washington Examiner Videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=videoseries

Comments are closed.